Low Scenario
iStock: $360/year
Motion Array: $150/year
300 hd stock videos
The iStock vs Motion Array earnings comparison estimates realistic stock income for iStock and Motion Array contributors using 2026 contributor payout ranges. The goal is not to crown a universal winner, because exclusivity, upload time, and buyer audience can change the answer for each contributor. For exclusive programs, the calculator keeps the comparison nonexclusive unless the page clearly models exclusivity. This page models 300 hd stock videos on iStock, then shows low, average, and high revenue bands with monthly, yearly, daily, and per-asset values. Adjust the asset count, switch the scenario, and use the result as a planning baseline before producing the next batch.
| Platform | Photo RPI | Video RPC | Payout | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iStock | $0-$3/asset/year | $1-$10/asset/year | $100 | not allowed |
| Motion Array | n/a | $1-$5/asset/year | n/a | not stated |
iStock: $360/year
Motion Array: $150/year
300 hd stock videos
iStock: $1,050/year
Motion Array: $540/year
300 hd stock videos
iStock: $3,000/year
Motion Array: $1,500/year
300 hd stock videos
Yes. The default average estimate is rendered into the HTML during the PHP build. JavaScript only updates the numbers live when you change an input.
The calculator estimates contributor revenue before production costs, taxes, gear, software, models, props, travel, and editing time.
Use it only on platforms that allow AI content and label it according to marketplace rules. AI-generic content often needs a lower demand multiplier because supply is extremely high.
It is a planning estimate based on contributor-reported payout ranges, annualized per-asset revenue, and the visible inputs on this page. Real results vary with keywording, content quality, review acceptance, buyer mix, and seasonality.
Stock income is uneven. A strong commercial niche, better metadata, and recurring buyer demand can lift the same asset count far above a weak or oversupplied library.
Only pages and platforms with explicit exclusive and nonexclusive commission fields can model an exclusivity bonus. Otherwise, the calculator keeps the nonexclusive baseline.